LA VERITA’ SUL TERMINE ‘NEPHILIM’

La questione del nome NEPHILIM sembra davvero essere spinosa, ma é senz’ altro meritevole di essere trattata perchè permette, ancora una volta, di capire quanto la conoscenza delle lingue venga sfoggiata impropriamente per portare la gente verso la proprie ‘convinzioni personali’.

Mi riferisco, chiaramente, alla critica dello studioso Michael Heiser riguardo all’ interpretazione fatta da Zecharia Sitchin a riguardo del suddetto termine.Sitchin, come ben sapranno i suoi lettori, asserisce che i NEPHILIM sono coloro che sono scesi dal cielo sulla terra, identificandoli negli IGIGI, un gruppo di divinità adorate in mesopotamia dai sumeri e dai babilonesi.Sitchin affronta questo termine sostenendo, come comunemente risaputo, che NEPHILIM deriva dalla radice NAPHAL che significa ‘cadere’, che lui estende a ‘scendere’. E’ bene intanto chiarire che Sitchin é uno studioso nato in Azerbaijan ma di razza ebrea.

Ha vissuto per tanti anni in Palestina dove sostiene di aver appreso la sua ‘lingua originale’, l’ ebraico, e di essersi dedicato (nonostante i suoi titoli di studio non abbiano a che fare con le lingue e la religione) allo studio della Bibbia ebraica.Sitchin, forse per comodità, parla di radice NAPHAL, il modo che si usa comunemente per occidentalizzare la radice linguistica originale:NPL. Dunque secondo Sitchin i Nephilim sono ‘coloro che sono caduti’ e, per estensione, ‘coloro che sono scesi’.

Dobbiamo, per correttezza, far notare che in tantissime lingue, o meglio in quasi tutte, c’ é una distinzione tra ‘scendere’ e ‘cadere’. Il termine ‘scendere’ infatti descrive un atto intenzionale, al contrario di ‘cadere’.

La critica dello studioso Michael Heiser, che vanta ben 2 titoli di studio come specialista di lingua ebraica e di letteratura ebraica (e non manca di sfoggiare questi suoi titoli per criticare chiunque), é orientata su entrambi gli aspetti della vicenda relativa al termine Nephilim:

- Nephilim non deriva da NPL, poichè la sua vocalizzazione differisce dai normali derivati di tale radice;
- NPL non può essere usato con il significato ‘volontario’ di ‘scendere’

Analizziamo entrambi gli aspetti distintamente, perchè ciò che scopriamo é davvero interessante.

NEPHILIM NON DERIVA DALL’ EBRAICO NAPHAL

Nel suo sito http://www.sitchiniswrong.com Heiser dedica un intero PDF al termine NEPHILIM, dal quale andiamo a prendere gli stralci più significativi. Intanto, per non smentirsi, Heiser inizia con un avvertimento ai seguaci di Sitchin:

“If you’re a follower of ancient astronaut theorist Zecharia Sitchin, you may want to run the other way since this short paper will not only show you how the meaning Sitchin’s says is impossible really IS what the word means, but you’ll see how sadly inept Sitchin’s work in Hebrew is. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.”

In questo passaggio Heiser si permette di prendere in giro i seguaci di Sitchin dicendo che, probabilmente, preferiranno ‘scappare’ perchè il suo documento mostrerà quanto Sitchin sia ignorante in materia di ebraico.Per fare una premessa simile bisogna essere sicuri di essere inattacabili... e come vedremo tra poco non é assolutamente il caso di Michael Heiser.Heiser inizia la sua spiegazione facendo parecchi giri di parole e spiegando le vocalizzazioni, per poi arrivare (finalmente) al nocciolo:

“The root consonants of the word spelled defectively (without that extra yod) are therefore: n-ph-l. This is why so many have thought that nephilim comes from naphal – it looks that way due to the consonants. But there’s a problem with that. Since nephilim occurs once (Num 13:33) in a “full” form – with the middle yod – that tells us that the scribes of the Hebrew Bible knew the correct pronunciation of the consonant string had a long “i” sound between the “ph” and the “l”. ”

Questa ultima asserzione, che gli scribi della bibbia ebraica conoscevano che in quel dato punto andava inserita una ‘i’ lunga viene messa qui per sviare il lettore, fargli perdere il filo, per poi dargli una nuova nozione che non capirà, ma accetterà come buona. Heiser infatti prosegue:

“Well, as the plural form is spelled, the word can only be two things in terms of Hebrew morphology: (1) a plural of a masculine noun; (2) an active masculine plural participle.”

Cioè Heiser sostiene che, per come questa forma plurale (Nephilim, plurale di Nephila) é scritta può indicare formalmente solo due casi:

- un plurale di un nome maschile
- un ‘participio attivo’ maschile plurale

Heiser analizza la seconda opzione e scrive:

“If the root is from Hebrew “n-ph-l” / naphal (“to fall”), the masculine plural participle would be spelled like this in the Hebrew Bible:

This word is pronounced “nophelim” with long “o” not the middle long“i” vowel as required. The vowels are different. You don’t need to read Hebrew to tell that, either – it’s visually obvious. This shows us that the word nephilim is NOT the active participle of Hebrew naphal.”

Cioè Heiser ha introdotto qui il concetto, senza spiegarlo o fornirne motivazione, per cui se Nephilim fosse un participio attivo maschile plurale si sarebbe dovuto scrivere NOPHELIM.Non contento, Heiser continua con i concetti fuori tema per confondere ancora di più. E poi, come presagendo l’ obiezione che gli si può muovere, mette le mani avanti e tenta di screditare una teoria rapportandola alle sue asserzioni. In sostanza dice:

“Some argue that nephilim means “those who ARE fallen,” as in those who are evil, or who “have fallen” in battle. [...] These options have one thing in common: they assume a passive idea in the word’s meaning – an outside force caused the falling. This would mean the form of the participle should be passive. But the above form (“nophelim”) is not the correct form of a plural passive participle. The masculine plural passive participle of naphal is spelled yet another way:


This form is pronounced “nephulim” with middle long “u” vowel – not middle long “i” vowel as required. This shows us that the form of the word nephilim does not derive from the passive participle of Hebrew naphal either. The word nephilim does not mean “fallen ones” if the root is considered to be Hebrew naphal.”

In questo passaggio Heiser dice che alcune teorie sostengono che Nephilim significhi ‘coloro che sono caduti’, facendo l’ esempio di ‘caduti in battaglia’ ma che i significati attribuiti esprimono un concetto ‘passivo’ e non attivo, e chi sostiene questa ipotesi sbaglia perchè NOPHELIM non é la forma passiva. Ma cosa c’ entra ‘Nophelim’? Heiser utilizza un termine (Nophelim) con una vocalizzazione che non ha spiegato nè motivato (la O anzi che la I) dicendo che non é la forma per un passivo che altri studiosi attribuiscono invece a NEPHILIM.Heiser poi asserisce che il participio passivo é ancora diverso ed é NEPHULIM com la U anzi che la I.Heiser poi si lancia in affermazioni atte a disorientare il lettore.

In sostanza egli dice che NEPHILIM protrebbe derivare dalla radice NAPHAL (come esattamente dice Sitchin) ma... da quella ARAMAICA e non da quella EBRAICA.Cioè prima Heiser cerca di dimostrare che Nephilim NON deriva dalla radice Naphal ebraica e poi sostiene che potrebbe derivare da quella Naphal aramaica.

Non posso credere che a Heiser non sia chiara la relazione storica Ebraico - Aramaico. La Bibbia infatti fu composta in ebraico, e solo successivamente fu tradotta in aramaico. La Torah, che contiene la ‘versione originale’ della Genesi, fu scritta in ebraico e non in aramaico, lingua nella quale venne tradotta solo molto tempo dopo.

Heiser, studioso e laureato in lingua e letteratura ebraica, non conosce nemmeno la storia della lingua che ha studiato: le prime versioni della Bibbia risalgono al VII secolo a.C., e nessuno studioso mai ha affermato che la lingua aramaica sia succeduta all’ ebraico prima del IV secolo a.C. Ben 3 secoli dopo. Non solo, le ultime scoperte archeologiche e linguistiche hanno messo d’ accordo gli studiosi sul fatto che quando si sostiene generalmente che a un certo punto l’ ebraico fu ‘soppiantato’ dall’ aramaico, si sta commettendo un errore poichè c’ é evidenza del fatto che nel ‘periodo aramaico’ ci si trovasse in una società multiculturale e polilinguistica ove ebraico e aramaico venivano utilizzati contemporaneamente, ma con continua preferenza per l’ ebraico.

Quando dunque Heiser sostiene che Nephilim potrebbe derivare da NAPHAL aramaico, sta commettendo un errore madornale, o ancora meglio sta mentendo spudoratamente cercando di far pensare al lettore che NAPHAL aramaico fosse diverso da NAPHAL ebraico, o che le prime versioni della Bibbia, scritte in ebraico, utilizzassero un termine aramaico di un periodo successivo.Questo gioco di Heiser fu già denunciato dal webmaster e allievo di Sitchin, Erik Poltorak, nel suo documento intitolato: “There Are Mistranslations in the Bible and the Word Elohim Can Be Used as a Plural” nel quale segnala alcuni strattagemmi usati da Heiser per portare avanti le sue tesi. E’ bene leggerne uno stralcio per rendersi conto:

“I must tell the public that Heiser's use of translations from text that are younger than the Bible show that he does not understand what this debate is about. It is not about contemporary mistranslations that have been made by modern translators. This debate is about what older influences were placed into the original Bible. By the way we just saw debunker trick #4, which is to reverse the process so that you can use proof of translations from younger documents to prove translating mistakes in older documents.”

Ma torniamo alla questione puramente linguistica. Come detto Heiser ha sostenuto che Nephilim non può derivare dalla radice ebraica NAPAHL e non può essere nè il participio attivo (Nophelim) nè quello passivo (Nephulim). Abbiamo bisogno dunque che uno studioso con un titolo quantomeno parificabile a quello di Heiser si esprima in merito. Ebbene, questo studioso esiste, ed é il docente universitario Ronald S. Hendel, docente dell’ università di Berkley, laureato ad Harvard nel 1985, le cui credenziali sono: “Professor of Hebrew Bible Biblical Literature, Religion, and History, Northwest Semitic Philology, Comparative Mythology”

Leggiamo cosa dice Hendel nel suo saggio: “Of demigods and the Deluge”:

“Nephilim significa letteralmente ‘I caduti’[vedi note] [...] Questo uso del verbo Naphal e dei suoi derivativi é riscontrato in atri punti nella Bibbia, per esempio nel lamento di Davide per la morte di Saul e Jonathan, in cui si legge: “Ek Naphelu Gibborim” (come guerrieri caddero), o nell’ avvertimento di Geremia ai falsi profeti: “Laken yippelu bannophelim” (cadranno tra i caduti)”

Nella nota, Hendel scrive chiaramente: “Nephilim é il ‘qatil’ passivo aggettivale della radice ‘naphal’ = ‘cadere’”

Cosa é il Qatil? Viene chiarito molto bene nel libro: “A grammar of Biblical Hebrew” di Jouon e Muraoka:

“The verbal adjective has the forms Qatil and Qatul, and it is these forms that make the stative perfects, which are nothing but ‘conjugated adjectives’”

Dunque un emerito professore di lingua e letteratura ebraica ci chiarisce cosa in definitiva sia il termine Nephilim, e ci mostra la falsità della analisi fatta da Heiser.

NEPHILIM NON PUO’ ESSERE USATO COME ‘SCESI’

La seconda parte dell’ obbiezione di Heiser é che la raice NAPHAL ha solo il significato di ‘cadere’ e non di ‘scendere’, poichè il verbo utilizzato dagli ebrei per questo secondo significato é ‘YARAD’.

Heiser insomma porta il discorso sulla fine distinzione tra un atto volontario o meno. Ma ha ragione a farlo? Siamo sicuri che questa distinzione sia così netta in ebraico? La risposta é secca: NO.

Cercando il significato di YARAD nel dizionario di ebraico biblico (http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=03381) leggiamo:

Original Word : ירד
Word Origin : a primitive root
Transliterated Word : yarad
Phonetic Spelling : yaw-rad

DEFINITIONS:
to go down, descend, decline, march down, sink down
a (Qal)
to go or come down
to sink
to be prostrated
to come down (of revelation)

b (Hiphil)
to bring down
to send down
to take down
to lay prostrate
to let down

c (Hophal)
to be brought down
to be taken down

Ho evidenziato appositamente due significati per far notare che mentre il primo ha un significato attivo e volontario (to go or come down = andare giù / scendere) il secondo ha un significato passivo che per sua natura può essere sia volontario che involontario (to be taken down = essere portato giù).

Ma non é finita, leggiamo i significati che il vocabolario assegna al verbo YARAD prendendoli così come tradotti nella Bibbia ebraica:

KJV (372) - (come, go, etc) down, 340; abundantly, 1; descend, 18; down by, 1; fell, 2; indeed, 1; let, 1; light off, 1; out, 1; put off, 1; sank, 1; subdued, 1; take, 1; variant, 2;

Come vediamo il verbo Yarad che secondo Heiser dovrebbe essere il ‘scendere’ (come down - descend) intenzionale é utilizzato anche come ‘cadere’ (fell = caduto) non intenzionale.

In generale si può dire che Yarad ha un significato volontario o involontario a seconda del contesto in cui si trova, e che ogni termine ha un significato vero e proprio e vari che gli derivano da ‘estensioni’ perfettamente lecite.
Allora torniamo a NAPHAL o meglio a NEPHILIM e vediamo se una simile ‘estensione’ é giustificata.
A venirci in aiuto é sempre il saggio di Hendel, che riporta un passo del libro di Ezechiele:

"They lie with the warriors,
The Nephilim of old,
Who descend to Sheol
With their weapons of war."

Dove i Nephilim, definiti ‘guerrieri’ SCENDONO volutamente nel ‘mondo cavo’ (Sheol significa ‘tomba’ - ‘pozzo’, ed é un termine che rappresentò in epoca tarda il corrispondete dell’ Absu sumero).

Dunque nel testo biblico si attribuisce in questo passagio un ‘atto volontario’ di discesa. Lo stesso avviene nella Genesi, quando si dice che i Nephilim ‘scendono’ sulla terra per accoppiarsi con le ‘figlie degi uomini’.

Non é dunque sbagliato estendere il ‘caduti’ del termine Nephilim in ‘scesi’ perchè diffatto almeno in due occasioni nella Bibbia questo ‘popolo’ é definito come un gruppo che é volontariamente sceso sulla terra.

L’ obiezione di Heiser quindi é errata e fuorviante in entrambi i sensin cui é posta, e Heiser, che ha accusato Sitchin di essere un ignorante in materia di lingua ebraica, smentito da un emerito professore di lingua ebraica fa egli stesso la figura dell’ ignorante.

http://altragenesi.blogspot.it/2015/05/ ... hilim.html

The Scottish Rite of the Irish Children of the Nephilim

It was in the lands of Western Europe where the mighty Nephilim would continue their sagas of kings, conquest, religion and legends. The true origins of the Scottish Rite of the Irish Children of the Nephilim would begin early in the fourth and fifth centuries. These epic stories of the Sons of God in Western Europe would carry on into the modern world; such as in Britain, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, Russia, America and many other countries where we can all witness their influence to this very day.



This is their true apocalyptic story like it has never been told before.

The legend of this race we are told in scriptures, that these, with all the others, in the thousand one hundred and seventieth year of the world, took to themselves wives, and they continued in their madness with them unto the flood. And there were born unto them three sorts, the first were great giants, and to the giants were born Nephilim, and to the Nephilim were born Elioud. And they increased in their power, and taught each other and their wives sorcery and incantations.

They taught men to make swords, knives, shields, breastplates, the fabrication of mirrors, the workmanship of bracelets, ornaments, the use of paint, beautifying of the eyebrows, the use of stones of every valuable and select kind, and of all sorts of dyes, so that the world became altered. Impiety increased, fornication multiplied, and they transgressed and corrupted all their ways.

This is why the meaning of the word Nephilim, is to fall.

These Elioud, or Sons of Nephilim had used their God-given giant intellects, and spiritual lives to fall away from God when they took the sacrilegious vow at Mount Hermon on Crete in order to create a material world filled with magic, sorcery, weapons, war, vanity and selfishness. They were also known by such names as the Curetes, Telchines, and the Priests of Pan to name a few. After all, they were the accursed Sons of Cain from Babylon who were marked by God for their transgressions.



Eventually the children of the Nephilim would make their way from Crete and other countries surrounding the Mediterranean into Italy, France, Spain, Germany, Ireland, Scotland, Russia, and England where they would rule to become mighty kings.

THE NEPHILIM KINGS OF IRELAND AND SCOTLAND

One of the most ancient people of Ireland were children of the Nephilim, who gave their name to the Irish Province of Ulster. Their name was the Ulaid or Ulaidh (singular Ulad or Uladh), which would be the Old Irish spelling of the biblical Hebrew Elioud. Ulster is derived from Ula-ster, the Irish name Uladh being pronounced Ulla. The Kings of Ulster were of the Ulaid and Dál Riata who were a branch of the Érainn; also known as the Darini of Ptolemy, which is another name for the Ireland (Érin) royalty. Please note the banner of Ulster to the right, with the Star of David, red hand, and cross. All symbols of the Tribe of Judah. Erin Go Bragh.......

These Elioud migrated to Ireland from the East approximately 2,700 years ago, where they became known as the Ulaid. They are descendants of the sea-faring races of the Phoenician Hebrews, and Greek Hellenes who gave rise to the Celtic people in Western Europe, and who were known biblically as the Elioud; which as I mentioned above is where they get their name of the Ulaid . They were also sometimes known in literature as the Picts (Painted People) of Ireland, and Scotland; and also the Jutes of Kent, and Umbrians of Northumbria.



The Ulaid (Picts) original religious customs and their secret society were led by a priestly class called the Druid Bards, who were the successors of their ancestors, the Phoenician Bards. The Druids were master poets who often concealed their secret teachings orally in their poems; and by the time they were 20 years old, they were said to have mastered by memory only, over 20,000 poems. Women were also allowed to be Druids as well. But later they would separate themselves as sect of Christianized Druids who were known as the Culdees.

These Culdees would put their teachings to writing and books at the Island of Iona in Scotland and would become known biblically, as the Hebrew Hivites and Levites, who would later join their Celtic Church with the Roman Church to form the unified Catholic (a word that means Universal) Brotherhood that would be composed of both Jew and Gentile. They all have the same or very similar customs and rites, and can be easily compared side by side to one another like Sir Godfrey Higgins had done in his book, the Celtic Druids. Also, Michael Tsarion had said in The Irish Origins of Civilization, Volume 2; The Levites were originally Irish Druids, not Jews as we know them.

THE MEANING AND ETYMOLOGY OF ELIOUD (ULAID)

The Elioud (also transliterated Eljo) are the children of the Nephilim and are also considered to be known as the watchers, and fallen angel hybrid race of their own. They were also known as the mighty men of renown, Sons of God (Bene Elohim), Sons of Cain, Phoencians, Cadimians, Sidonians, Hivites and many other names.

In the genealogy of Jesus Christ in Matthew’s gospel traced through the line of David, we find that one of Jesus’s ancestors is Zadok, the father of Achim, the father of a certain Eliud (’Ελιουδ; Matt. 1.14–15), the great-great-grand-father of Joseph.

The etymology of the Hebrew/Phoenician word Elioud is composed of the words, El, Io, and Ud. You will also find this name in Welsh charters, which it is clear it is not originally a Welsh word, but it was Hebrew and taken to the Welsh. The Welsh etymology is also very similar, where it is said the meaning of el is many and iud is lord. I believe that this is a mistranslation, and it has the same meaning as the Hebrew.

The word El is a generic name for God like can be found in the word Elohim.

The word Io is related to the words wisdom and knowledge. Sir Godfrey Higgins had written, "in Syriac Io, was the God of Wisdom or Knowledge. In Hebrew letters Io was written it' io; this, as the Hebrew letter o was corrupted into ng, was the origin of the gnios. The God of Wisdom was the spiritual fire. He was Agni."

The meaning of the word Ud is "brand or branded."

Therefor, the meaning of Elioud would be something like "branded with the spiritual fire of Godly wisdom, or wisdom branded by the spirit fire of God."

This mark, or brand I will explain more below in my section on the Mark of Cain.

PROOF OF THE BIBLICAL ELIOUD IN WALES AND ENGLAND

The name of the Elioud you will not just find in the bible, but also a direct connection to history in this time period in early medieval Wales, and also England where this name Elioud is spelled Eliud, and is well documented. It is written in the three charters in the Book of Llandaf, which give details of property transfers to the Church from various local Welsh kings and other Brethren, dated from the late 6th to the late 11th century.

As I explained in my article, The Book of Life, when a royal prince, king and/or tribe was baptized into the Catholic Church, the church made actual immortal legal contracts, and real life charters with these new pagan converts to Christianity. Hence, to be a mighty medieval pagan king who is baptized and thus incorporated into the church, did not just entail holy water and a priests blessing. No, it required lengthy legal contracts, charters, and often were written on skin, sealed, and signed in blood. These pagan kings were not stupid, and they demanded their rites and property be protected and listed in charters with the church.

Unfortunately for the Anglo-Saxon Brethren who had made these deals with the church in blood, Norman tribes with a bigger sword would cut through many of these alleged immortal contracts, making them mortal. A new Norman era and rewriting of their own charters, contracts and Book of Life. I will write about these blood sealed contracts, and legal charters with the church in a future article.

You will find the Nephilim listed in some of these charters such as the Book of Llandaf, where there is a witness who is a royal layman called Eliud; and one of the charters appended to the “Vespasian” recension of Lifris’s Life of Saint Cadog, has a lay-witness called Eliudus. There is a Teuyth, Elyud filius in the Life of Saint Winefred; Eudegern vab Elud in the pedi-gree of St. Beuno ( Ach Beuno)appended to the Welsh Life of the saint, Buchedd Beuno; and a Beli ap Eilud in the genealogical tract Ach Brenhinoedd a ThywysogionCymru(Pedigrees of the Kings and Princes of Wales). The earliest attestation, though, is in the marginalia of the Lichfield Gospels (the principal gospel-book of the church at Llandeilo Fawr during the ninth century), where Eliud appears in memo-randa 3 and 7. This Eliud is St. Teilo himself.(By John Reuben Davies)

Like most of the priests, abbots, and bishops in medieval Europe were the children or royalty; Cadog was also the son of a Welsh king and is credited with the establishment of many churches in Cornwall, Brittany, Dyfed and Scotland. This name Cad-dog is very similar to the Phoenician Prince Cadmus, who was the first school master of the Greeks, and who taught them writing, arts, and methods of war. There is also the English Cadman (Cædmon /ˈkædmən/ or /ˈkædmɒn/), which is the earliest English (Northumbrian) poet whose name is known.


Cadmus and Caedman are also known in mythology as the God Hermes. The names Cadmus and Caedman have a secret meanings which I explained in my article, The Meaning of Hermes; the word Cad or Kad is "to fall", which would directly identify them as the Nephilim of the scriptures. These biblical and mythical names they adopted such as the English Caedman, and Elioud, were never done by coincidence, but on purpose to honor their ancestors, in which they were the hereditary descendants who were simply carrying the torch, and light of their work.

The Doctor of the church, Saint Bede would be instrumental in helping write English history, and also in translating and changing the Bible. His role as Doctor would not be in the medical sense as a noun, but more like the meaning of the verb doctor which is "to change the content or appearance of (a document or picture) in order to deceive; falsify." In Bede's case, it would be to conceal and hide, while honoring the various Gallic, Scottish, Irish and English Anglo-Saxon kings, princes, bishops and Saints. This is simply what a Doctor of the Church does, and as I mentioned above, they also encoded the names of kings into their books, charters, and their own priesthood that had adopted names from their ancestors of the Old Testament; names I will explain briefly below.

Now let's get back to the the Book of Llandaf and the Welsh branch of the Nephilim.

There is mentioned in this book, a charter belonging to a King Idon (Iudon), son of Ynyr Guent (Gwent). In the name King Idon, we can clearly see the similarity with the Phoenician/Hebrew Ida for Mount Ida (Mount Hermon) on Crete which is the birthplace of Zeus (Jupiter or God), and the exact place where the Nephilim had made the sacrilegious vow. The name Ida is from the Phoenician, French and German meaning of Ida or Ada; that is "Nobility, King or Queen." This is why they were known as the Idumeans (Judeans), and biblically as the Tribe of Judah. These are the royal workers, servants and kings of God who took the sacrilegious vows at Mount Ida, which is the birthplace of the King Zeus.

It is said in the Book of Llandaf, for the exchange of an eternal fatherland, King Idon sacrificed one of his mansions, Lann Garth, and all its territory, which had formerly belonged to St. Dubricius, Archbishop. The King going round the whole territory and carrying the Gospel on his back with the clergy bearing crosses in their hands and sprinkling holy water and dust of the pavement of the church and sepulchre in all his boundaries perambulated the whole. King Idon granted in alms for the health of his soul, and the souls of his ancestors. Kings and Princes, to God, and St. Peter, and to Archbishop Teilo.

There are also two people named Eliud, Eliud (map) Stater, and Eliud Mac Cincen who are known from the genealogies in London, BL, MS Harley 3859;62. This Eliud Mac Cincen, may in fact be the man who was born on the isle of the blessed, Iona Island, Scotland. Bede said that Kenneth was a Gael, and a king of Dál Riata, who had inherited the throne of Pictland through a Pictish mother. He was king of the Picts, first King of Scotland, and his name was Cináed mac Ailpín (Modern Gaelic: Coinneach mac Ailpein), commonly Anglicised as Kenneth MacAlpin, credited as indirectly creating the current day British monarchy; the current Queen Archon being Queen Elizabeth II.

The name Elizabeth is derived from the Old Irish Eileena Eilis (Ee-liss), meaning "oath of God." Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, (born Prince Philippos of Greece and Denmark) prince consort of Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom. The name Phillip we can connect to the Centaur using etymology. Phillip is derived from Philippos which is from the Greek: Φίλιππος Β΄ ὁ Μακεδών – φίλος phílos, “friend” and ἵππος híppos, “horse.”

I had written about the Kingdom of Kent in my article, The Centaurs: Half Men and Half Horse Sons of God, where I explain that the old Kingdom of Jute was originally Juteland or the land of the Jutes, and is now known as the Kingdom of Kent. Jutland, is regarded as Judah’s land. An adjective for Jute is “Jutish,” pronounced jootish. The name Kent is derived from the Centaurs (Ken-taurs or Khan-taurs). In the etymology of the word Centaur (or Kentaur), we find the two words Cen (Ken) and Taur. I have found the meaning in the name Cen or Ken, to represent fire or a torch. In Anglo-Saxon, it is spelled Kenaz (“torch”), and the name Cinaed is partly derived from the Celtic aidhu, meaning “fire”. This again connects the children of the Nephilim, the Elioud whose etymology we have found the meaning is "branded with the spiritual fire of Godly wisdom, or wisdom branded by the spirit fire of God."

In my article, The Lost Tribe of Judah in Ireland, I explained that there was an Irish King Baedan who was a Culdee Druid, and the grandson of Muiredhach who was grandson of Niall of the Hostages; and his grandmother was Erca, the beautiful daughter of Loarn, a prince of Scottish Dalriada; and through this union he became the father of the senior line of the Hy-Niall kings. Baedan’s father was named Muircertach (Muircheartach Mor Mac Earca), and was Hi King of Ireland and the Beda race until his murder in approximately the year 520-533 AD. Medieval Ulster genealogists describe him as rí Érenn ocus Alban (king of Ireland and Scotland).

They are the children of the Nehpilim.......

THE SONS OF CAIN WHO HAVE BEEN MARKED AND BRANDED BY GOD

As I mentioned above, the meaning of the name Elioud is "branded with the spiritual fire of Godly wisdom, or wisdom branded by the spirit fire of God." Hence, they were the sons of Cain, the accursed and branded by God as it is said in the scriptures when God confronted Cain about Abel’s death; God responded, “Not so; if anyone kills Cain, he will suffer vengeance seven times over”, and God “set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him” (Gen. 4:15).

The Mark of Cain I had written about before, where I explain that this mark is a special birthmark that only the Sons of Cain, or the Nephilim have. The mark of the fallen ones.

One of the only physical traits we know of Pythagoras, is that he had a special golden birthmark on his thigh. Seleucus had Apollo’s symbol, an anchor, as a birthmark on his thigh. Judas had a birthmark. Augustus Caesar had seven birthmarks resembling a constellation on the front of his torso. The Arch-Druids Lost Son was said to have a golden birthmark and were signs of the Celtic Sun God; and it has been said by many authors such as Sir Godfrey Higgins, that they were Pythagoreans. Then we have the famous 6th or 7th century tale of King Arthur, who it is said to have been born with a birthmark that helped determine his royal status and then subsequent rise to fame. Sir Launcelot had been born with a singular birth-mark upon his shoulder which had the appearance as of a golden star enstamped upon the skin. We also have the prophet Mohammad whose birthmark were said to be signs that he was the chosen one of prophecy.

The white or golden birthmark we connect to Cain through the various languages, such as its meaning in Old Irish and Celtic, white; and Cain or qayin in Hebrew, the meaning is spear. Aristotle said that the descendants of Camdus, the Spartoi (the sown) really bore a birthmark in the shape of a spear. As I mentioned in some of my previous articles, Cadmus was also known as Hermes, and it was at Mount Hermon where Hermes was born and also where the Nephilim had also taken the sacrilegious vows. In some legends it was said the Goddess gave him an ivory shoulder; thenceforward the shoulders of his descendants continued to display a white birthmark

Plutarch had to say this about the divine birthmark in his book, On the delay of the divine justice;


“as the warts and birth-stains and freckles of fathers, not appearing in their own children, crop out again in the children of their sons and daughters; as a certain Greek woman, giving birth to a black child, when accused, of adultery, discovered that she was descended in the fourth generation from an Aethiopian; as among the children of Pytho the Nisibian, said to belong to the Sparti, the one who died lately bore the impress of a spear on his body, — a race-mark after so many ages rising and emerging as from the depths of the sea, — so not infrequently earlier generations conceal and merge ancestral habits and dispositions, while afterward and through later generations the inherited nature comes to flower, and reproduces the family tendency to vice or to virtue.

The armed men that sprang from the teeth of the dragon sown by Cadmus, from whom the oldest families in Thebes — a large part of the Boeotian aristocracy — were said to have descended. Something like this mythical birthmark had probably made its appearance on the body of a member of one of these ancient families. Nisibis was a Syrian city with an extensive commerce, with many Greek, and probably some Boeotian immigrants.

It may be that, in cases where the inheritance of a morbid physical constitution, or of proclivity to moral evil, seems to lapse in the first generation and to reappear in the second, the children of the diseased or depraved father have the physical or moral traits of their father, but are made and kept vigilant and faithful in self-care and self-discipline by the memory of their father’s infirmities or sins ; while their children have the inheritance without the warning.”

THE IRISH NEPHILIM IN THE BIBLE AND IN ENGLAND

Not only can we find the children of the Nephilim in Ireland, as their, they would also migrate to England. Their stories are documented in the bible by their Nephilim descendants who had become known as the Levites; and were then as Saint Bede had said, "allegorically, they were attached to the church."

This was approximately the time when the church decided to conceal the true identities of those Brethren who serve the church. From the time of Bede forward, you will find that many of the priests, bishops and Saints of the church began to allegorize their names, and conceal their true identities. But they would not just adopt any old name, but the biblical names of their ancestors. For example, Bede had written on a seventh-century bishop of Rochester, called Ithamar who was a Kentishman, and the first Bishop in England.

You will find the name Ithamar in the Old Testament as one of the two sons of Aaron who then became the two lines of priestly succession in ancient Israel. Bede had chosen this name for that very reason which would be appropriate to begin their evangelization of much of Western Europe.

The Elioud had carried the torch of illumination, religion, war and commercial trade into Western Europe, where a new beginning of the Nephilim would officially begin. The Era of the Scottish Rite of the Irish Children of the Nephilim.



Erin Go Bragh…….

http://gnosticwarrior.com/scottish-rite-nephilim.html

Nephilim - I caduti

I Nephilim erano i figli dei Grigori e delle donne. Nella libro della Genesi si legge: "C'erano sulla terra i giganti a quei tempi - e anche dopo - quando i figli di Dio si univano alle figlie degli uomini e queste partorivano loro dei figli: sono questi gli eroi dell'antichità, uomini famosi" (Gn 6, 4).



"Famosi" può significare in questo caso anche "temuti", poichè i Nephilim erano giganti violenti che, secondo il libro di Enoch, terrorizzavano gli uomini e, secondo altre fonti, li riducevanoo in schiavitù e li mangiavano. La maggior parte dei Nephilim e i Grigori furono annientati dal Diluvio Universale. Il libro di Enoch è considerato apocrifo, ma è accolto dalla Chiesa ortodossa etiope come canonico.

La Chiesa parla di Grigori a partire dal XIII secolo. I Grigori, nella gerarchia celeste, appartenevano al decimo Coro, gli unici angeli sessuati accettati dalla Chiesa.

Nell'Antico Testamento l'espressione ebraica "benej ha'elohim", figli di Dio, fa riferimento proprio ai Grigori, il cui nome può significare sia "i veglianti" o "coloro che non dormono mai". Questi angeli erano i più simili all'uomo, sia fisicamente che spiritualmente, e furono tra i primi che si unirono a Satanel per ribellarsi a Dio. I Grigori avevano gli occhi dorati e dimensioni colossali (ecco perchè erano guardiani).

Enoch dice che aiutarono gli arcangeli nella creazione del Paradiso e in seguito duecento di loro si arrampicarono sul monte Hermon (nell'attuale Medio Oriente) per vegliare sugli uomini e istruirli sulla conoscenza del bene. A causa di questa vicinanza all'uomo, però, unita alla loro sessualità e all'incapacità di resistere alle tentazioni, si abbandonarono ai piaceri della carne. Si unirono alle donne e procrearono degli esseri giganti, i Nephilim. Le donne dopo il parto morivano.

Inoltre i Grigori insegnarono alle donne anche i misteri del Cielo, trasmettendo loro conoscenze di matematica, astronomia, tecnica, come prepararre armi di metallo e profumi.



I Grigori più celebri sono: Semjasa, Urakib, Arameel, Akibeel, Tamiel, Ramuel, Danel, Ezeqeel, Saraqujal, Asael, Armers, Batraal, Anani, Zagebe, Samsaveel, Sartael, Turel, Jomajel e Sariel.

Alcuni studiosi interpretano i "figli di Dio" come i discendenti di Set e i "figli degli uomini" come i discendenti di Caino. Altri interpretano i "figli di Dio"come personaggi storici umani e divinizzati in seguito dalla tradizione orale.

Un'altra ipotesi sostiene che i Nephilim erano neandertaliani sopravvissuti o ibridi tra Homo sapiens e uomo di Neanderthal.

http://salvatorecapo-misteri.blogspot.i ... aduti.html