Thethirdeye ha scritto:
Ci sarà traccia in rete di queste conferenze?
![[8]](./images/smilies/UF/icon_smile_8ball.gif "Palla Otto")
No, non c'e' alcuna traccia delle conferenze ne del fantomatico oceanografo Dr. Meyer Verlag.
Quindi, in sintesi:
- la storia del Dr. Brown e' reale, nel senso che Brown racconto' realmente questa storia;
- la parte delle conferenze e dell'oceanografo Dr. Meyer Verlag e' stata inventata di sana pianta da WWN;
- la sfera di cristallo sembra realmente esistere e sembrerebbe ora in possesso di Arthur Fanning a Sedona;
Recentemente c'e' stata un'analisi della vicenda a cura del Dr. Gregory Little, un documentarista impegnato nella ricerca sulle rovine che in un qualche modo possano collegare con il mito di Atlantide. Queste le sue conclusioni:
While I tend to lean toward the hoax explanation, the truth is that no one will probably ever disprove Brown’s story and it’ll be used time and again to support various ideas. I also confess that while the story seems very far-fetched, it’s also possibly true. The crystal does exist and many people swear that it has some sort of mystical power. As with all incredible reports, all of us can and will believe whatever we are predisposed to believe. I’m happy with ending by saying that I don’t think it’s true but I don’t really know. I’ll never know for certain and I’m okay with that. And with 5 divers supposedly seeing a mass of marble ruins spread across a vast area of sea floor I have to wonder why none of them went back or at least left some sort of written account of it.
Inoltre, lo stesso Little, dopo aver partecipato alla trasmissione Coast-to-Coast, ha detto:
After being a guest on the George Noory (Coast-to-Coast) show over a year ago I received an email from an elderly man who said he had been a friend of Brown since childhood. After exchanging a few emails he related that Brown confided to him that the entire affair was a hoax Brown concocted to take advantage of all of the media controversy that had been stirred up by the 1968 discovery of the Bimini Road. He explained that Brown simply wanted to be a part of it.
A supporto di questa ultima versione, anche l'analisi della storia di Brown da un punto di vista delle immersioni da lui descritte che risulterebbero incompatibili con l'attrezzatura da lui utilizzata.
Le conclusioni dell'analisi sono le seguenti:
The original ‘Ray Brown’ stories of the 1970s are false. There is no part of that area that a 1970s scuba diver could reach that we couldn’t find. He couldn’t go below a hundred feet for more that a couple of minutes with the equipment described in the story. Also, treasure salvors have no problem scouring an area that is shallow enough for sport scuba gear. There would be no hiding giant glass pyramids.
The current stories of French and American divers finding something in the Bermuda triangle are equally false and no one has been able to cite who these divers are. Because the exact location is never documented, we don’t even know if the depths involved can be dove without submarines.
When you look at the search and recovery technology of today, we could find these things. Read the stories of finding the Titanic or the treasure wreck S.S. Central America. We have been unable to document the quotes from experts in these stories and cannot even document the existence of the named experts.
Login
Iscriviti
FAQ
Cerca
Lo Storico dai mille nomi
Guarda su ![[:291]](./images/smilies/UF/dubbioso.gif "Dubbioso")
![[:299]](./images/smilies/UF/piacevolmente_colpito.gif "Piacevolmente colpito")
![[:p]](./images/smilies/UF/icon_smile_tongue.gif "Goloso"){kind=icon}