Hannah ha scritto:



Mettiti al sicuro.

iLGambero ha scritto:
E anche questa teoria la possiamo mettere nel cassetto, tra le tante altre.
Non c'è stato alcun effetto di amplificazione, anzi, questo periodo è stato il più tranquillo degli ultimi mesi, l'esatto opposto di quanto previsto.
Ci sono sciami sismici in atto, ma quelli ci sono sempre.

Q2. What was it that first drew your attention to Elenin and has incorporated this object into your research? Has it compelled you to revisit any of your previous theories?

Omerbashich: The Elenin was suitable for testing of my concept because its trajectory, with inclination of around 1º, is virtually coplanar to our solar system. It also approaches the Sun relatively slowly, traveling along the legs of a hyperbola. These characteristics are enabling long alignments amongst the Elenin, the Earth and a third body.

The Elenin also drags gravitationally locked particles spanning 30k+ km, but neither its relatively small mass nor relatively low density constitute forbidding factors for causing strong earthquakes in the georesonator. No other object with similar properties has been noticed in our solar system in the past few decades, to the best of my knowledge.

In fact, I estimate that objects with as coincidental such characteristics as the Elenin’s can appear at most twice per century. This made the passage of the Elenin a unique opportunity for testing my concepts empirically as robustly as possible, given that instrumental records of earthquakes span barely one century too. So there is no reason why the Elenin would make me revisit my concepts as its behavior has been in excellent agreement with them.


Q11. When compared with the Comet Halley, the coma of Elenin is half the size. Likewise, when compared with Comet Hale-Bopp, which was a bright magnitude 0 comet, Elenin will at best, be a magnitude 4 or 6 - just visible to the unaided eye. Lacking the size and brightness of any number of great comets and by a substantial factor, how is it that Elenin qualifies as georesonator causality.

Omerbashich: The trajectories of other significant (relatively sizable and relatively slow) celestial objects, including those you mention, all have forbidding inclinations. Obviously, not being coplanar to our solar system, it is thus impossible for such objects to ever align with any of the bodies that compose our solar system.

And those that occasionally do align are mostly short-periodic, meaning they usually travel on an elliptic-parabolic trajectory, making their approach less relatively slow than that along the legs of a hyperbola (virtually straight lines for the most part of the Elenin’s travel through our solar system). Furthermore, most other objects make no significant gravitational shadow, i.e., they do not drag a sizeable amount of gravitationally locked particles, etc.

Q12. Given the present ephemeris for Comet Elenin, it will be 0.2 AU from Earth when the next planetary alignment happens on September 27, 2011. Assuming we fix September 27, 2011 as the peak of a bell curve, what do you see as seismic event possibilities, preceding and following this high point on the curve?

Omerbashich: As I already mentioned, mass plays no role in my concepts, so the same goes for distance as related to mass in the Newtonian-Einsteinian magical view. As mentioned in my alignments paper, the Elenin will speed up significantly from August-October on its sling-shot pass about the Sun. During that time, the Elenin will not have enough time to partake in long alignments, and all that it will be able to produce in terms of setting off the resonance magnification (earthquakes) is some mild seismicity as predicted by my concepts, mostly due to the size of the Sun when the Sun is involved in the alignment.

Worth noting is that I do neither modeling nor prediction of specific earthquakes. Based on the pattern of resonance magnification for strong seismicity during long alignments, I provide only the status of our planet's overall oscillatory excitation from the mantle's magnified resonance as set off by celestial alignments. You can find this status at: http://sites.google.com/site/omerbashich/. (Note there will be no status updates when there are no significant alignments, as only the quiescent times in terms of strong seismicity are expected under my concept in the absence of significant alignments.)

Without auxiliary information on precursors, locations of strong earthquakes can be approximated only once the planet goes well into an alignment. This practically means that most accurate prediction would require additional knowledge on atmospheric, solar-activity and other types of non-terrestrial precursors.

Such precursors have been studied for decades. They do fit the georesonator concept, as a consequence of the proposed forcing from the Space towards the Earth, and not some magical "outgoing radiation" as proposed by some to be originating inside the Earth and propagating outwards.

zakmck ha scritto:

Secondo i dati di Omerbashich le due date possibili sono il 24/09 e 28-29/09. Mi sembra ci sia una certa coincidenza di previsioni.

AlessioLBG ha scritto:
zakmck ti contraddico... ho letto molto a riguardo e sto continuando a farlo.. la teoria è interessante ma riprende pari pari quella di bendandi...

concordo sul fatto che queste interazioni possono influire... non sul fatto che qualcuno possa prevederle... secondo me ci sono troppe variabili in gioco e ne sappiamo ancora troppo poco

Based on the pattern of resonance magnification for strong seismicity during long alignments, I provide only the status of our planet's overall oscillatory excitation from the mantle's magnified resonance as set off by celestial alignments.

Without auxiliary information on precursors, locations of strong earthquakes can be approximated only once the planet goes well into an alignment. This practically means that most accurate prediction would require additional knowledge on atmospheric, solar-activity and other types of non-terrestrial precursors.

Such precursors have been studied for decades. They do fit the georesonator concept, as a consequence of the proposed forcing from the Space towards the Earth, and not some magical "outgoing radiation" as proposed by some to be originating inside the Earth and propagating outwards.

AlessioLBG ha scritto:
avevi detto questo... l'ho riportato...

cmq sono molto interessato e sto aspettando evoluzioni della cosa...

THINK TUNING FORKS: SEPTEMBER MILESTONE
01.10.2011

Predictive abilities of the Hyperresonator are now confirmed: the September milestone (6th month into near real-time monitoring and no-miss prediction of oscillation's M6+ magnification) is reached. It was a complete success. The Elenin has interfered Earth's multiple alignments, thus causing a complete shutdown of Earth magnified oscillation. According to the past 100 years of data, such multiple alignments cause mega-quakes, of M8.5+.

As I predicted in my alignments paper (all versions) and interviews: while doing its majestic sped-up dance about the Sun, the Elenin is saving the Earth from havoc normally arising from multiple alignments such as those occurring in September, 2011. Not only that it is not partaking in many very long alignments between August-October, but its own oscillation naturally interfered the Earth's multiple alignments of September (for interference illustration, see Fig.12 in the paper). Therefore, as much as it has been causing mega-quakes on Earth in the past, our tiny companion-traveler (and the only comet in the Solar system for the past century or so!) is thus also shielding the Earth from what would likely be the most devastating series of earthquakes in centuries.


Near real-time tracking of Earth's M6+ magnified oscillation (http://www.seismo.info).
T(Earth) in the Hyperresonator equations is the Earth's normal mode of oscillation.
Note Earth magnified oscillation's complete shutdown by Elenin interference.

And it's all very (VERY) simple as far as the Hyperresonance concept is concerned: think tuning forks, triggering each other at a distance (and forget about "God's particle" invoked to explain Newton-Einsteinean magical trickery of "attraction at a distance"). Of course, this requires a medium for the vibration to propagate as well as interfere throughout, but what a nice demonstration of aether, 360 degrees Space-wise! (Say time -- what?!)

It confirms the recent finding by NASA's "epic experiment" (as I said earlier, data collection seems to be the only activity this military-intelligence agency rarely screws up). Although the NASA experiment obviously detected aether as well, Einstein's groupies painted it too as yet another "verification of relativity" (see the previous post on the truly epic Italian experiment, which once and for all killed relativity and tons of related nonsense).